The Voice of The Child
28-01-11
Ofsted are again having their findings queried – no surprise, huh? In this article in Community Care it turns of the contrasting evidence of Ofsted and Adoption UK: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2011/01/26/116174/loughton-casts-doubt-on-ofsted-adoption-inspections.htm
Wilt is very pro-adoption, provided of course that parents and extended families are rigorously and fairly ruled out as being suitable, and quickly double-time – not an easy task. It is important that children are not allowed to languish in the care system or be repeatedly taken in and out of care, or likewise added to and removed repeatedly from child protection registers. All too often children’s services interventions are shallow, casual, ill-focused and ultimately non-effective.
Children should of course be placed in same-race placements as a first principle, but on principle opposing trans-racial placements is perverse, potentially cruel, definitely political correctness at its worst and fundamentally flawed. That said, seeking a same race placement is absolutely correct, for a limited period of time. Leaving children in limbo in the hope of achieving the ideal is misguided.
Yet there are those who persist in this perverse thinking and accuse others of being “racist” if they demure or worse challenge the practice of political correctness. And these people can
be found in all sectors – public, voluntary and private. The fact that Ofsted yet again miss vital facts in their inspections represents possibly similar attitudes, but at least a growing factual history of their general incompetence.
It seems to Wilt that Loughton and the Government are far more in touch with what needs to happen in local communities, in provision of local services and in identifying where there are barriers to good practice than Ofsted. What value Ofsted? Would they be missed?
Wilt


